BSR Chapter 5

Chapter 5 - Days Were Strictly Categorized as Show Days, Travel Days, or Off Days

In the old school touring model, the structure of the schedule was rigidly defined, with days strictly categorized as show days, travel days, or off days. This compartmentalization created a sense of predictability, but it also contributed to a lack of flexibility  that could be detrimental to crew members' well-being. The expectation was that individuals would conform to this structure without question, often leading to feelings of frustration and burnout. 


Show days were characterized by intense preparation and performance, leaving little room for rest or recovery. Crew members were expected to be on high alert, ready to address any issues that arose during the show. Travel days, on the other hand, were often marked by long hours on the road, with little opportunity for downtime. Off days, while intended for rest, were frequently overshadowed by the exhaustion accumulated during the previous days. 


This rigid categorization of days left little room for personal needs or emotional well-being. Crew members often found themselves struggling to balance the demands of the tour with their own self-care. The lack of flexibility in the schedule meant that personal commitments were frequently sidelined, leading to feelings of frustration and resentment. 


As the industry began to evolve, there was a growing recognition of the need for a more flexible approach  to touring. The emergence of the "new school" mentality has allowed for a more compassionate approach, where individuals are encouraged to prioritize their well-being while still fulfilling their professional responsibilities. This shift has created a more balanced touring experience, where personal needs are acknowledged and respected


This white paper snippet is part of a series of 20, the full paper can be found at:


White Papers
Share by: